🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a latest legal decision.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an larger panel of 11 judges. The court also vacated a previous decision from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the latest turn in a protracted legal battle over whether the administration has the legal right and justification to send national guard forces in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since the end of September when the mobilization attempt was initiated in due to months of protests.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has claimed that government employees at the ICE facility in south Portland were under attack, while local authorities assert that municipal police have command of the situation.

Contrary to descriptions of Portland as a conflict zone, locals have been posting videos of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning activities such as an protest bicycle event against the increased military presence.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this period – one preventing the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the deployment of any military personnel in Oregon, after attempts to evade the first order by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling remained in place, blocking the actual deployment of the forces.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with all decisions under consideration simultaneously – by a group of 11 judges.

“This decision shows that facts are important and that the judicial system are working to hold this administration accountable. The founding document limits the executive authority, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the military into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, principles, and autonomy as this case progresses and our legal battle continues in the courts.”